Systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma and limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: similarities and differences.

OBJECTIVES: To compare a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma (ssSSc) vs. patients with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc). METHODS: Forty-five patients with ssSSc and 186 patients with lcSSc were investigated. Demographic, clinical and immunologic features and survival were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between ssSSc and lcSSc in gender, age at onset and interval between onset and diagnosis. ssSSc patients fulfilled the ACR criteria for SSc less than lcSSc patients (13%/77%, p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in articular involvement, myopathy, tendon friction rubs and gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiac and renal involvements. There was a trend to higher prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in ssSSc patients (29%/19%) but not reach significant difference. The prevalence of antinuclear and anticentromere antibodies and slow capilaroscopic pattern was similar. Sicca syndrome (13%/30%; p=0.024), digital ulcers (16%/50%; p<0.0001), calcinosis (11%/26%; p=0.047) and acroosteolysis (0% /10%; p=0.028) were more frequently in lcSSc. Survival at 5, 10, and 15 yr was not different in ssSSc and lcSSc patients (100%/98%, 100%/98%, and 92%/89%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ssSSc and lcSSc patients share demographic, clinical and immunologic features. Survival is also similar in both groups. Differences are mainly due to peripheral vascular manifestations. However, despite great similarities, we believe that ssSSc patients should be considered as a different subset in order to avoid misdiagnosis. ssSSc patients should be truly differentiated from early SSc using sensitive and specific studies looking for any asymptomatic organ involvement.

2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative.

OBJECTIVE: The 1980 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) lack sensitivity for early SSc and limited cutaneous SSc. The present work, by a joint committee of the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), was undertaken for the purpose of developing new classification criteria for SSc. METHODS: Using consensus methods, 23 candidate items were arranged in a multicriteria additive point system with a threshold to classify cases as SSc. The classification system was reduced by clustering items and simplifying weights. The system was tested by (1) determining specificity and sensitivity in SSc cases and controls with scleroderma-like disorders, and (2) validating against the combined view of a group of experts on a set of cases with or without SSc. RESULTS: It was determined that skin thickening of the fingers extending proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints is sufficient for the patient to be classified as having SSc; if that is not present, seven additive items apply, with varying weights for each: skin thickening of the fingers, fingertip lesions, telangiectasia, abnormal nailfold capillaries, interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension, Raynaud's phenomenon, and SSc-related autoantibodies. Sensitivity and specificity in the validation sample were, respectively, 0.91 and 0.92 for the new classification criteria and 0.75 and 0.72 for the 1980 ACR classification criteria. All selected cases were classified in accordance with consensus-based expert opinion. All cases classified as SSc according to the 1980 ACR criteria were classified as SSc with the new criteria, and several additional cases were now considered to be SSc. CONCLUSIONS: The ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc performed better than the 1980 ACR criteria for SSc and should allow for more patients to be classified correctly as having the disease.

[Classification criteria of scleroderma]. / Critères de classification des sclérodermies.

Classification criteria of scleroderma aim to delineate the different clinical forms of the disease, which are associated with different prognoses. The basic classification between localized and systemic scleroderma remains pertinent. Among the former, the problems are essentially esthetic or sometimes functional; but the second may yield many other problems which are pertinent to function but also to life, owing to the involvement of body organs, including lungs, heart, digestive tract, kidneys and locomotor system. Overall, the quality of life of scleroderma patients is often poor. The patients are subclassified according to the skin involvement. Those patients with systemic scleroderma involving the trunk are classified as "Cutaneous diffuse systemic scleroderma"; the association of Raynaud's phenomenon, capillaroscopic abnormalities and specific autoantibodies defines "limited systemic scleroderma"; among the latter patients, those with distal skin involvement are classified "Cutaneous limited systemic sclerosis". The old term "CREST" tends to be abandoned due to its lack of specificity.

Scleroderma in South Australia: further epidemiological observations supporting a stochastic explanation.

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, prevalence, survival and selective demographic characteristics of scleroderma occurring in South Australia over the 10-year period 1993-2002. Analysis of the database of the South Australian Scleroderma Register: a population-based register established in 1993. Patients with scleroderma resident in South Australia (n = 353 at 2002) were ascertained from multiple sources and clinical and demographic data were obtained from mailed questionnaire and from review of computerized hospital databases, case notes or referring letters. Time-space cluster analysis was carried out according to the Knox method. Control data were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics census. The mean prevalence was 21.4 per 10(5) (95% confidence interval 20.2-22.6) and the mean cumulative incidence of 1.5 per 10(5) (95% confidence interval 1.32-1.73) with no significant change in incidence over the study period (P = 0.13). Cumulative survival improved over the study period, with patients with diffuse disease having significantly reduced survival (as compared with limited disease, P < 0.001). The proportion with diffuse disease ( approximately 22%) remained steady. There was a small but significant predisposition in patients with a continental European birthplace (P < 0.001). A family history of scleroderma was noted in 1.6% with lambda1 (familial risk) of 14.3 (95% confidence interval 5.9-34.5). However, a family history of systemic autoimmunity (especially rheumatoid arthritis) was more common (6%). No socioeconomic stratification, temporal clustering nor spatio-temporal clustering was observed either at time of initial symptom or at 10 years before disease onset. Scleroderma occurs relatively infrequently in South Australia with no significant change in incidence observed over the 10-year study period. However, cumulative survival has improved. Identified risk factors include family history of scleroderma (risk approximately 14-fold), female sex (risk approximately 5-fold) and European birthplace (risk approximately 2.5-fold); however, the majority of the disease variance appears unexplained. A stochastic explanation based on genetic instability is favoured to explain this paradox.

Classification of systemic sclerosis. Visions and reality.

Systemic sclerosis, scleroderma (SSc) is a disabling condition that shortens life expectancy. Disease heterogeneity and difficulties separating SSc from SSc-like conditions make classification an important issue. Limited cutaneous and diffuse cutaneous SSc, with different severity and survival, have been recognized for several years as distinct subsets. Some authors have suggested an intermediate cutaneous form with intermediate survival. This issue remains unsettled, however. The technique of capillaroscopy is helpful as an adjunct diagnostic tool to separate idiopathic Raynaud's phenomenon from SSc. Digitized video-capillaroscopy is developing as a powerful new method to assess individual capillaries over time. Using the simpler techniques of video-capillaroscopy, different patterns have been described and named 'early', 'active', 'late' and 'slow'. The value of nailfold video-capillaroscopy to distinguish different subsets or provide prognostic information for use in daily practice remains to be assessed. The features of CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud's, oesophagus dysmotility, sclerodactyly, telangiectasias) are not confined to single subsets of SSc. There is no convincing evidence of any advantage for distinguishing the limited, intermediate and diffuse forms of SSc rather than only the limited and diffuse forms.